| Title |
Quantitative classification and carbon density of the forest vegetation in Lüliang Mountains of China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Ecology, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11258-008-9507-x |
| Authors |
Xianping Zhang, Mengben Wang, Xiaoming Liang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 31% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,158,372
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Plant Ecology
#29
of 910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,165
of 88,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Ecology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 910 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them