| Title |
Ear wax removal interventions: a systematic review and economic evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp11x601497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma Loveman, Elena Gospodarevskaya, Andy Clegg, Jackie Bryant, Petra Harris, Alex Bird, David A Scott, Peter Davidson, Paul Little, Richard Coppin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 42% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,390,198
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,148
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,660
of 132,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#4
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.