↓ Skip to main content

Informed Consent in Veterinary Medicine: Ethical Implications for the Profession and the Animal ‘Patient’

Overview of attention for article published in Food Ethics, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Informed Consent in Veterinary Medicine: Ethical Implications for the Profession and the Animal ‘Patient’
Published in
Food Ethics, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41055-017-0016-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Ashall, Kate M. Millar, Pru Hobson-West

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 35 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 10%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 29 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,557,310
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Food Ethics
#31
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,876
of 326,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food Ethics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.