↓ Skip to main content

Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Neuro-Oncology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Radiomic subtyping improves disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical, and standard imaging characteristics in patients with glioblastoma
Published in
Neuro-Oncology, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/neuonc/nox188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Kickingereder, Ulf Neuberger, David Bonekamp, Paula L Piechotta, Michael Götz, Antje Wick, Martin Sill, Annekathrin Kratz, Russell T Shinohara, David T W Jones, Alexander Radbruch, John Muschelli, Andreas Unterberg, Jürgen Debus, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Christel Herold-Mende, Stefan Pfister, Andreas von Deimling, Wolfgang Wick, David Capper, Klaus H Maier-Hein, Martin Bendszus

Abstract

To analyze the potential of radiomics for disease stratification beyond key molecular, clinical and standard imaging features in patients with glioblastoma. Quantitative imaging features (n=1043) were extracted from the multiparametric MRI of 181 patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma prior to standard-of-care treatment (allocated to a discovery and validation set, 2:1 ratio). A subset of 386/1043 features were identified as reproducible (in an independent MRI-test-retest cohort) and selected for analysis. A penalized Cox-model with 10-fold cross-validation (Coxnet) was fitted on the discovery set to construct a radiomic signature for predicting progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). The incremental value of a radiomic signature beyond molecular (MGMT-promoter methylation, DNA-methylation subgroups), clinical (patients age, KPS, extent-of-resection, adjuvant treatment) and standard imaging parameters (tumor volumes) for stratifying PFS and OS was assessed with multivariate Cox-models (performance quantified with prediction error curves). The radiomic signature (constructed from 8/386 features identified through Coxnet) increased the prediction accuracy for PFS and OS (in both discovery and validation set) beyond the assessed molecular, clinical and standard imaging parameters (p≤0.01). Prediction errors decreased by 36% for PFS and 37% for OS when adding the radiomic signature (as compared to 29% and 27% with molecular + clinical features alone). The radiomic signature was - along with MGMT-status - the only parameter with independent significance on multivariate analysis (p≤0.01). Our study stresses the role of integrating radiomics into a multi-layer decision framework with key molecular and clinical features to improve disease stratification and to potentially advance personalized treatment of patients with glioblastoma.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Computer Science 10 7%
Engineering 8 6%
Physics and Astronomy 6 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 51 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,916,739
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Neuro-Oncology
#2,268
of 3,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,773
of 321,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuro-Oncology
#60
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.