| Title |
The drivers of tropical speciation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13687 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Tilston Smith, John E. McCormack, Andrés M. Cuervo, Michael. J. Hickerson, Alexandre Aleixo, Carlos Daniel Cadena, Jorge Pérez-Emán, Curtis W. Burney, Xiaoou Xie, Michael G. Harvey, Brant C. Faircloth, Travis C. Glenn, Elizabeth P. Derryberry, Jesse Prejean, Samantha Fields, Robb T. Brumfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 244 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 54 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 7% |
| Spain | 10 | 4% |
| Colombia | 7 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 2% |
| Brazil | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 135 | 55% |
| Scientists | 94 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 11 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 37 | 3% |
| United States | 20 | 2% |
| Colombia | 9 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Chile | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1184 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 241 | 19% |
| Researcher | 214 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 184 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 174 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 84 | 7% |
| Other | 236 | 18% |
| Unknown | 149 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 789 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 121 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 79 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | <1% |
| Other | 45 | 4% |
| Unknown | 192 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 285. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2020.
All research outputs
#128,327
of 26,014,510 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,393
of 99,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,028
of 251,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#112
of 979 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,014,510 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 979 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.