↓ Skip to main content

On the Validity of Popular Masculinity Rating Scales with Gay Men

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
On the Validity of Popular Masculinity Rating Scales with Gay Men
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10508-014-0363-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus Alt, Adam M. Lewis, William Ming Liu, Eric Vilain, Francisco J. Sánchez

Abstract

During the past decade, greater quantitative attention has been given to how gay men's lives are affected by traditional notions of masculinity. Consequently, it is important that masculinity-related measures that are often used in research are valid for use with gay men. This study examined the factor structures, loadings, and psychometric properties of three commonly used masculinity-related measures: the Gender Role Conflict Scale, the Conformity to Masculine Norms Inventory, and the Reference Group Identity Dependence Scale. Data were collected via an online survey of 920 self-identified gay men (M age = 32.48 years, SD = 11.73). Confirmatory factor analyses indicated that while the goodness of fit statistics did not always indicate the model fit, there were similar endorsements of items across the three masculinity scales and subscale factor loadings consistent with published studies using mostly heterosexual male samples. Implications for future masculinity scale research on gay men are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 20%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 50%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,236,620
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#3,357
of 3,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,100
of 238,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#48
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.