You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing conservation strategies for Mexican free-tailed bats: a population viability and ecosystem services approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0790-7 |
| Authors |
Ruscena Wiederholt, Laura López-Hoffman, Colleen Svancara, Gary McCracken, Wayne Thogmartin, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Brady Mattson, Kenneth Bagstad, Paul Cryan, Amy Russell, Darius Semmens, Rodrigo A. Medellín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2015.
All research outputs
#15,440,740
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,867
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,541
of 251,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.