| Title |
Game-based practice versus traditional practice in computer-based writing strategy training: effects on motivation and achievement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Educational technology research and development, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11423-014-9349-2 |
| Authors |
Antje Proske, Rod D. Roscoe, Danielle S. McNamara |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 38 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 17% |
| Psychology | 20 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 6% |
| Linguistics | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,682,250
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Educational technology research and development
#427
of 1,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,516
of 238,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational technology research and development
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.