You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Social Psychology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1111/bjso.12081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Genevieve A Dingle, Claire Stark, Tegan Cruwys, David Best |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 43% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 97 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 68 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2018.
All research outputs
#4,235,088
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Social Psychology
#439
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,397
of 253,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Social Psychology
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.