You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targetable Kinase-Activating Lesions in Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1403088 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn G Roberts, Yongjin Li, Debbie Payne-Turner, Richard C Harvey, Yung-Li Yang, Deqing Pei, Kelly McCastlain, Li Ding, Charles Lu, Guangchun Song, Jing Ma, Jared Becksfort, Michael Rusch, Shann-Ching Chen, John Easton, Jinjun Cheng, Kristy Boggs, Natalia Santiago-Morales, Ilaria Iacobucci, Robert S Fulton, Ji Wen, Marcus Valentine, Cheng Cheng, Steven W Paugh, Meenakshi Devidas, I-Ming Chen, Shalini Reshmi, Amy Smith, Erin Hedlund, Pankaj Gupta, Panduka Nagahawatte, Gang Wu, Xiang Chen, Donald Yergeau, Bhavin Vadodaria, Heather Mulder, Naomi J Winick, Eric C Larsen, William L Carroll, Nyla A Heerema, Andrew J Carroll, Guy Grayson, Sarah K Tasian, Andrew S Moore, Frank Keller, Melissa Frei-Jones, James A Whitlock, Elizabeth A Raetz, Deborah L White, Timothy P Hughes, Jaime M Guidry Auvil, Malcolm A Smith, Guido Marcucci, Clara D Bloomfield, Krzysztof Mrózek, Jessica Kohlschmidt, Wendy Stock, Steven M Kornblau, Marina Konopleva, Elisabeth Paietta, Ching-Hon Pui, Sima Jeha, Mary V Relling, William E Evans, Daniela S Gerhard, Julie M Gastier-Foster, Elaine Mardis, Richard K Wilson, Mignon L Loh, James R Downing, Stephen P Hunger, Cheryl L Willman, Jinghui Zhang, Charles G Mullighan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 779 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 763 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 135 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 114 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 74 | 9% |
| Other | 68 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 8% |
| Other | 168 | 22% |
| Unknown | 160 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 271 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 143 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 91 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 18 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 7% |
| Unknown | 187 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#416,216
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#5,947
of 32,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,825
of 251,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#75
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.