↓ Skip to main content

Information Processing Biases in the Brain: Implications for Decision-Making and Self-Governance

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroethics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Information Processing Biases in the Brain: Implications for Decision-Making and Self-Governance
Published in
Neuroethics, March 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12152-016-9251-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony W. Sali, Brian A. Anderson, Susan M. Courtney

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 39%
Neuroscience 7 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,195,519
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Neuroethics
#249
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,699
of 299,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroethics
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.