↓ Skip to main content

Autism Treatment in the First Year of Life: A Pilot Study of Infant Start, a Parent-Implemented Intervention for Symptomatic Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 5,484)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
28 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
270 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
471 Mendeley
Title
Autism Treatment in the First Year of Life: A Pilot Study of Infant Start, a Parent-Implemented Intervention for Symptomatic Infants
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2202-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. J. Rogers, L. Vismara, A. L. Wagner, C. McCormick, G. Young, S. Ozonoff

Abstract

The goal of early autism screening is earlier treatment. We pilot-tested a 12-week, low-intensity treatment with seven symptomatic infants ages 7-15 months. Parents mastered the intervention and maintained skills after treatment ended. Four comparison groups were matched from a study of infant siblings. The treated group of infants was significantly more symptomatic than most of the comparison groups at 9 months of age but was significantly less symptomatic than the two most affected groups between 18 and 36 months. At 36 months, the treated group had much lower rates of both ASD and DQs under 70 than a similarly symptomatic group who did not enroll in the treatment study. It appears feasible to identify and enroll symptomatic infants in parent-implemented intervention before 12 months, and the pilot study outcomes are promising, but testing the treatment's efficacy awaits a randomized trial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 462 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 17%
Student > Master 65 14%
Student > Bachelor 55 12%
Researcher 54 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 9%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 98 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 172 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 9%
Social Sciences 41 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 6%
Neuroscience 20 4%
Other 58 12%
Unknown 110 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 304. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#114,626
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#24
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#955
of 255,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.