| Title |
Failure mechanisms in alloy of polyamide 6,6/polyphenylene oxide under severe conditions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00557130 |
| Authors |
H. J. Sue, A. F. Yee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 3 | 60% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 3 | 60% |
| Engineering | 2 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2004.
All research outputs
#4,752,252
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#294
of 4,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,441
of 59,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#5
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,632 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.