↓ Skip to main content

Isolating wastes in the electrometallurgical treatment of spent nuclear fuel

Overview of attention for article published in JOM, July 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Isolating wastes in the electrometallurgical treatment of spent nuclear fuel
Published in
JOM, July 1997
DOI 10.1007/bf02914762
Authors

J. P. Ackerman, L. S. H. Chow, S. M. McDeavitt, C. Pereira, R. H. Woodman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 2 33%
Chemistry 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from JOM
#334
of 1,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,747
of 30,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOM
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.