| Title |
Semiaquatic adaptations in a giant predatory dinosaur
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1258750 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nizar Ibrahim, Paul C Sereno, Cristiano Dal Sasso, Simone Maganuco, Matteo Fabbri, David M Martill, Samir Zouhri, Nathan Myhrvold, Dawid A Iurino |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 390 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 75 | 19% |
| United States | 13 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 2 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Solomon Islands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 16 | 4% |
| Unknown | 266 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 374 | 96% |
| Scientists | 13 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 230 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 19% |
| Researcher | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 55 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 70 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 59 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1388. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#9,228
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from Science
#475
of 83,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 251,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.