↓ Skip to main content

Uncertainty in the fate of soil organic carbon: A comparison of three conceptually different decomposition models at a larch plantation

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uncertainty in the fate of soil organic carbon: A comparison of three conceptually different decomposition models at a larch plantation
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/2014jg002701
Authors

Yujie He, Jinyan Yang, Qianlai Zhuang, Anthony D. McGuire, Qing Zhu, Yaling Liu, Robert O. Teskey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 6%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 33 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Student > Master 5 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2014.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#1,314
of 1,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,325
of 260,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: BIOGEOSCIENCES
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.