↓ Skip to main content

Sexuality in Adolescent Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Self-reported Behaviours and Attitudes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
Title
Sexuality in Adolescent Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Self-reported Behaviours and Attitudes
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2226-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeroen Dewinter, Robert Vermeiren, Ine Vanwesenbeeck, Jill Lobbestael, Chijs Van Nieuwenhuizen

Abstract

Differences in sexual functioning of adolescents with and without autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are understudied. In the current study, self-reported sexual behaviours, interests and attitudes of 50 adolescent boys, aged 15-18, with at least average intelligence and diagnosed with ASD, were compared with a matched general population control group of 90 boys. Results demonstrated substantial similarity between the groups in terms of sexual behaviours. The only significant difference was that boys with ASD reacted more tolerant towards homosexuality compared to the control group. Results reveal that sexuality is a normative part of adolescent development in high-functioning boys with ASD. Hence, attention should be given to this topic in education and mental health care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 236 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Student > Bachelor 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 74 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 13%
Social Sciences 27 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 4%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 76 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,612,357
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#633
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,765
of 255,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#13
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.