↓ Skip to main content

Field Measurements of Terrestrial and Martian Dust Devils

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Field Measurements of Terrestrial and Martian Dust Devils
Published in
Space Science Reviews, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11214-016-0283-y
Authors

Jim Murphy, Kathryn Steakley, Matt Balme, Gregoire Deprez, Francesca Esposito, Henrik Kahanpää, Mark Lemmon, Ralph Lorenz, Naomi Murdoch, Lynn Neakrase, Manish Patel, Patrick Whelley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 35%
Physics and Astronomy 5 19%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,689,396
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#893
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,780
of 323,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.