↓ Skip to main content

Observed Initiation and Reciprocity of Physical Aggression in Young, At-Risk Couples

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family Violence, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,341)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
207 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Observed Initiation and Reciprocity of Physical Aggression in Young, At-Risk Couples
Published in
Journal of Family Violence, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10896-007-9067-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah M. Capaldi, Hyoun K. Kim, Joann Wu Shortt

Abstract

The present study examined sex differences in initiation of physical aggression as observed during discussion tasks and in the likelihood of a similar response from the partner. In addition, patterns for men and women in the prevalence of aggression initiation and partner reciprocation across 4 time points spanning approximately 9 years from late adolescence through the mid-20s are examined, as well as overall associations with reported aggression and injuries. Findings indicated that the young women were more likely than the men to initiate physical aggression at late adolescence, but by the mid-20s in early adulthood there were no significant sex differences in initiation rates. The average rates of reciprocation across the 4 time points appeared to be similar for men and women. Women and men appeared more likely to report injuries if the couples observed physical aggression involved mutual aggression in their interactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 207 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 95 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 27 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 33 33%
Social Sciences 19 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 33 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 181. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#226,577
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family Violence
#7
of 1,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#436
of 170,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family Violence
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them