You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hyperbranched Fluoropolymer-Polydimethylsiloxane-Poly(ethylene glycol) Cross-Linked Terpolymer Networks Designed for Marine and Biomedical Applications: Heterogeneous Nontoxic Antibiofouling Surfaces
|
---|---|
Published in |
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1021/am505296n |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kevin A. Pollack, Philip M. Imbesi, Jeffery E. Raymond, Karen L. Wooley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 32% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 13 | 28% |
Engineering | 6 | 13% |
Materials Science | 6 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,752,252
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#2,196
of 17,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,834
of 259,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
#34
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.