↓ Skip to main content

Callous-Unemotional Traits and the Treatment of Conduct Problems in Childhood and Adolescence: A Comprehensive Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 412)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
Title
Callous-Unemotional Traits and the Treatment of Conduct Problems in Childhood and Adolescence: A Comprehensive Review
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10567-014-0167-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J. Hawes, Matthew J. Price, Mark R. Dadds

Abstract

The treatment of conduct problems among children and adolescents with callous-unemotional (CU) traits has been subject to much speculation; however, treatment outcome research has been surprisingly limited and findings have been mixed. This review examines the research to date in this field as it pertains to two key questions. First, are CU traits associated with clinical outcomes and processes in the family based treatment of child and adolescent conduct problems? Second, can family based intervention produce change in CU traits? Using a systematic search strategy, we identified 16 treatment outcomes studies that can be brought to bear on these questions. These studies provide strong evidence of unique associations between CU traits and risk for poor treatment outcomes, while at the same time indicating that social-learning-based parent training is capable of producing lasting improvement in CU traits, particularly when delivered early in childhood. We discuss the potential for this emerging evidence base to inform the planning and delivery of treatments for clinic-referred children with CU traits, and detail an ongoing program of translational research into the development of novel interventions for this high-risk subgroup.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 319 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 52 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 16%
Researcher 31 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 63 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 182 55%
Social Sciences 24 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 5%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 74 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#678,448
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#34
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,004
of 243,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them