↓ Skip to main content

Making Education for All inclusive: where next?

Overview of attention for article published in PROSPECTS, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
358 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Making Education for All inclusive: where next?
Published in
PROSPECTS, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11125-008-9055-0
Authors

Mel Ainscow, Susie Miles

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 358 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Iceland 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 346 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Postgraduate 19 5%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 82 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 157 44%
Psychology 36 10%
Arts and Humanities 33 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 1%
Computer Science 5 1%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 90 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2014.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from PROSPECTS
#204
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,955
of 90,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PROSPECTS
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them