↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring parasite diversity for malaria elimination in sub-Saharan Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Science, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring parasite diversity for malaria elimination in sub-Saharan Africa
Published in
Science, September 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1259423
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anita Ghansah, Lucas Amenga-Etego, Alfred Amambua-Ngwa, Ben Andagalu, Tobias Apinjoh, Marielle Bouyou-Akotet, Victoria Cornelius, Lemu Golassa, Voahangy Hanitriniaina Andrianaranjaka, Deus Ishengoma, Kimberly Johnson, Edwin Kamau, Oumou Maïga-Ascofaré, Dieudonne Mumba, Paulina Tindana, Antoinette Tshefu-Kitoto, Milijaona Randrianarivelojosia, Yavo William, Dominic P Kwiatkowski, Abdoulaye A Djimde

Abstract

The African continent continues to bear the greatest burden of malaria and the greatest diversity of parasites, mosquito vectors, and human victims. The evolutionary plasticity of malaria parasites and their vectors is a major obstacle to eliminating the disease. Of current concern is the recently reported emergence of resistance to the front-line drug, artemisinin, in South-East Asia in Plasmodium falciparum, which calls for preemptive surveillance of the African parasite population for genetic markers of emerging drug resistance. Here we describe the Plasmodium Diversity Network Africa (PDNA), which has been established across 11 countries in sub-Saharan Africa to ensure that African scientists are enabled to work together and to play a key role in the global effort for tracking and responding to this public health threat.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Unknown 170 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 18%
Researcher 31 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 25 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 7%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 28 15%
Unknown 28 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,118,857
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Science
#27,509
of 79,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,596
of 248,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#400
of 903 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 903 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.