You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using multivariate statistics to explore trade‐offs among spatial planning scenarios
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12345 |
Authors |
Linda R. Harris, Matthew E. Watts, Ronel Nel, David S. Schoeman, Hugh P. Possingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 8% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Colombia | 1 | 4% |
Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
South Africa | 1 | 4% |
France | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 75% |
Scientists | 5 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
United States | 3 | 2% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Greece | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 22% |
Student > Master | 20 | 15% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 15% |
Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 39% |
Environmental Science | 50 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
Engineering | 2 | 1% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Unknown | 23 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,264,894
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#1,351
of 3,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,099
of 259,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.