↓ Skip to main content

Crisis information distribution on Twitter: a content analysis of tweets during Hurricane Sandy

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Crisis information distribution on Twitter: a content analysis of tweets during Hurricane Sandy
Published in
Natural Hazards, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11069-017-2960-x
Authors

Bairong Wang, Jun Zhuang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 146 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 26%
Student > Master 14 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 42 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 25 17%
Social Sciences 23 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 8%
Engineering 11 8%
Arts and Humanities 6 4%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 53 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,480,316
of 23,003,906 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,303
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,991
of 316,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,003,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.