| Title |
An evaluation of primers for microsatellite markers in Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) and their performance in a Peruvian wild population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics Resources, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12686-014-0317-2 |
| Authors |
George Olah, Robert G. Heinsohn, Jose R. Espinoza, Donald J. Brightsmith, Rod Peakall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 18% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 18% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,204,738
of 23,130,383 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics Resources
#70
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,399
of 239,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics Resources
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,130,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.