↓ Skip to main content

Population Differences in Finger-Length Ratios: Ethnicity or Latitude?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population Differences in Finger-Length Ratios: Ethnicity or Latitude?
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10508-006-9039-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

John C. Loehlin, Dennis McFadden, Sarah E. Medland, Nicholas G. Martin

Abstract

The relative length of the second and fourth fingers (the 2D:4D ratio) has been taken to be an indicator of prenatal exposure to testosterone, and hence possibly relevant to sexual orientation and other sex-differentiated behaviors. Studies have reported a difference in this ratio between Caucasian males in Britain and in the U.S.: higher average 2D:4D ratios were obtained in Britain. This raises the question of whether differences among different Caucasian gene pools were responsible or whether some environmental variable associated with latitude might be involved (e.g., exposure to sunlight or different day-length patterns). This question was explored by examining 2D:4D ratios for an Australian adolescent sample. The Australians were predominantly of British ancestry, but lived at distances from the equator more like those of the U.S. studies. The Australian 2D:4D ratios resembled those in Britain rather than those in the U.S., tending to exclude hypotheses related to latitude and making differences in gene pools a plausible explanation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Turkey 1 3%
Switzerland 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 6 16%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 18%
Social Sciences 4 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,167,841
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#994
of 3,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,034
of 66,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.