↓ Skip to main content

Electroactive bacteria—molecular mechanisms and genetic tools

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
192 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
Title
Electroactive bacteria—molecular mechanisms and genetic tools
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00253-014-6005-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Sydow, Thomas Krieg, Florian Mayer, Jens Schrader, Dirk Holtmann

Abstract

In nature, different bacteria have evolved strategies to transfer electrons far beyond the cell surface. This electron transfer enables the use of these bacteria in bioelectrochemical systems (BES), such as microbial fuel cells (MFCs) and microbial electrosynthesis (MES). The main feature of electroactive bacteria (EAB) in these applications is the ability to transfer electrons from the microbial cell to an electrode or vice versa instead of the natural redox partner. In general, the application of electroactive organisms in BES offers the opportunity to develop efficient and sustainable processes for the production of energy as well as bulk and fine chemicals, respectively. This review describes and compares key microbiological features of different EAB. Furthermore, it focuses on achievements and future prospects of genetic manipulation for efficient strain development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 386 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 26%
Researcher 57 14%
Student > Master 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 45 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 45 11%
Unknown 81 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 74 19%
Environmental Science 59 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 13%
Engineering 32 8%
Chemical Engineering 21 5%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 101 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,908,521
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,404
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,246
of 239,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#17
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.