You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in breast cancer: recommendations by an International TILs Working Group 2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Oncology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1093/annonc/mdu450 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Salgado, C. Denkert, S. Demaria, N. Sirtaine, F. Klauschen, G. Pruneri, S. Wienert, G. Van den Eynden, F.L. Baehner, F. Penault-Llorca, E.A. Perez, E.A. Thompson, W.F. Symmans, A.L. Richardson, J. Brock, C. Criscitiello, H. Bailey, M. Ignatiadis, G. Floris, J. Sparano, Z. Kos, T. Nielsen, D.L. Rimm, K.H. Allison, J.S. Reis-Filho, S. Loibl, C. Sotiriou, G. Viale, S. Badve, S. Adams, K. Willard-Gallo, S. Loi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 27% |
| Belgium | 3 | 12% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 46% |
| Scientists | 7 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1468 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 212 | 14% |
| Researcher | 195 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 129 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 110 | 7% |
| Other | 106 | 7% |
| Other | 287 | 19% |
| Unknown | 443 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 497 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 164 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 104 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 60 | 4% |
| Engineering | 28 | 2% |
| Other | 139 | 9% |
| Unknown | 490 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,038,107
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#475
of 7,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,445
of 252,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#8
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.