↓ Skip to main content

Should nurses or clinical pharmacists perform medication reconciliation? A randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Should nurses or clinical pharmacists perform medication reconciliation? A randomized controlled trial
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00228-014-1741-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trine Aag, Beate Hennie Garcia, Kirsten K. Viktil

Abstract

To study differences in outcomes of medication reconciliation (MR) when performed by clinical pharmacists compared to nurses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 74 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 21 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#909
of 2,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,498
of 253,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.