↓ Skip to main content

Low Weight and Overweightness in Older Adults: Risk and Clinical Management

Overview of attention for article published in Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low Weight and Overweightness in Older Adults: Risk and Clinical Management
Published in
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.pcad.2014.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eiman Jahangir, Alban De Schutter, Carl J. Lavie

Abstract

The prevalence of individuals who are overweight or obese is growing exponentially in the United States and worldwide. This growth is concerning, as both overweightness and obesity lead to impaired physical function, decreased quality of life, and increased risk of chronic diseases. Additionally, overweightness and obesity are related to increased mortality among young and middle-aged adults. This weight-related risk of mortality is more ambiguous among older adults. In fact, obesity may be protective in this population, a relationship described as the "obesity paradox". In this review we discuss the effects of overweightness and obesity among the elderly on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, along with the risks of low weight. We conclude by discussing the goal of weight management among older adults, focusing particularly on benefits of preserving lean body mass and muscular strength while stabilizing body fat. Ideally, overweight or mildly obese elderly individuals should devise a plan with their physicians to maintain their weight, while increasing lean body mass through a plan of healthy diet, behavioral therapy, and physical activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 13%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 5 6%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 28 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 17%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 35 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,982,037
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
#753
of 1,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,352
of 318,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them