You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HLA-DQA1–HLA-DRB1 variants confer susceptibility to pancreatitis induced by thiopurine immunosuppressants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Graham A Heap, Michael N Weedon, Claire M Bewshea, Abhey Singh, Mian Chen, Jack B Satchwell, Julian P Vivian, Kenji So, Patrick C Dubois, Jane M Andrews, Vito Annese, Peter Bampton, Martin Barnardo, Sally Bell, Andy Cole, Susan J Connor, Tom Creed, Fraser R Cummings, Mauro D'Amato, Tawfique K Daneshmend, Richard N Fedorak, Timothy H Florin, Daniel R Gaya, Emma Greig, Jonas Halfvarson, Alisa Hart, Peter M Irving, Gareth Jones, Amir Karban, Ian C Lawrance, James C Lee, Charlie Lees, Raffi Lev-Tzion, James O Lindsay, John Mansfield, Joel Mawdsley, Zia Mazhar, Miles Parkes, Kirstie Parnell, Timothy R Orchard, Graham Radford-Smith, Richard K Russell, David Reffitt, Jack Satsangi, Mark S Silverberg, Giacomo C Sturniolo, Mark Tremelling, Epameinondas V Tsianos, David A van Heel, Alissa Walsh, Gill Watermeyer, Rinse K Weersma, Sebastian Zeissig, Jamie Rossjohn, Arthur L Holden, Tariq Ahmad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 36% |
| United States | 7 | 21% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 45% |
| Scientists | 13 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 24% |
| Unknown | 31 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 34 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,070,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#1,806
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,976
of 260,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#32
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.