↓ Skip to main content

High variability of the subjective visual vertical test of vertical perception, in some people with neck pain – Should this be a standard measure of cervical proprioception?

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High variability of the subjective visual vertical test of vertical perception, in some people with neck pain – Should this be a standard measure of cervical proprioception?
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2014.08.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Treleaven, Hiroshi Takasaki

Abstract

Subjective visual vertical (SVV) assesses visual dependence for spacial orientation, via vertical perception testing. Using the computerized rod-and-frame test (CRFT), SVV is thought to be an important measure of cervical proprioception and might be greater in those with whiplash associated disorder (WAD), but to date research findings are inconsistent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 23 28%