↓ Skip to main content

Digitally Driven Integrated Primary Care and Behavioral Health: How Technology Can Expand Access to Effective Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Digitally Driven Integrated Primary Care and Behavioral Health: How Technology Can Expand Access to Effective Treatment
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0838-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lori Raney, David Bergman, John Torous, Michael Hasselberg

Abstract

Widespread implementation of integrated primary care and behavioral health is possible, but workforce shortages, competencies to deliver evidence-based approaches, and sufficient reimbursement are lacking. There are numerous telehealth solutions that could be utilized to assist with integration efforts that have the potential to be successfully used alone or in combination. This will require that the developers of such technologies understand the current evidence base for effective integration efforts and apply this knowledge to new solutions. Evidence-based models of integrated care such as the collaborative care model have a robust evidence base including studies that demonstrate effective delivery from remote locations. Technology solutions that can serve as practice extenders by performing some of the tasks, and can expand the competency of primary care providers to treat mild to moderate mental illness, have an emerging literature in the behavioral health arena that shows promise for integrating care. More widespread implementation of effective integrated primary care and behavioral health can be accomplished with the help of technology solutions that can address the problems of workforce shortages and competencies. Use of these technologies alone or in combination is a growing area of research and development and an untapped frontier that warrants further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 44 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 20%
Psychology 20 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,217,016
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#374
of 1,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,201
of 327,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#17
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.