↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Very Early Intervention for Infants At-Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
501 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility and Effectiveness of Very Early Intervention for Infants At-Risk for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2235-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Bradshaw, Amanda Mossman Steiner, Grace Gengoux, Lynn Kern Koegel

Abstract

Early detection methods for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in infancy are rapidly advancing, yet the development of interventions for infants under two years with or at-risk for ASD remains limited. In order to guide research and practice, this paper systematically reviewed studies investigating interventions for infants under 24 months with or at-risk for ASD. Nine studies were identified and evaluated for: (a) participants, (b) intervention approach (c) experimental design, and (d) outcomes. Studies that collected parent measures reported positive findings for parent acceptability, satisfaction, and improvement in parent implementation of treatment. Infant gains in social-communicative and developmental skills were observed following intervention in most of the reviewed studies, while comparisons with treatment-as-usual control groups elucidate the need for further research. These studies highlight the feasibility of very early intervention and provide preliminary evidence that intervention for at-risk infants may be beneficial for infants and parents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 501 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 493 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 80 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 15%
Researcher 59 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 10%
Student > Bachelor 47 9%
Other 96 19%
Unknown 96 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 185 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 9%
Social Sciences 34 7%
Neuroscience 11 2%
Other 54 11%
Unknown 125 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,361,124
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,209
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,042
of 258,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#32
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.