↓ Skip to main content

Current status of viroid taxonomy

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
Current status of viroid taxonomy
Published in
Archives of Virology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00705-014-2200-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Di Serio, R. Flores, J. Th. J. Verhoeven, S.-F. Li, V. Pallás, J. W. Randles, T. Sano, G. Vidalakis, R. A. Owens

Abstract

Viroids are the smallest autonomous infectious nucleic acids known so far. With a small circular RNA genome of about 250-400 nt, which apparently does not code for any protein, viroids replicate and move systemically in host plants. Since the discovery of the first viroid almost forty-five years ago, many different viroids have been isolated, characterized and, frequently, identified as the causal agents of plant diseases. The first viroid classification scheme was proposed in the early 1990s and adopted by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) a few years later. Here, the current viroid taxonomy scheme and the criteria for viroid species demarcation are discussed, highlighting the main taxonomic questions currently under consideration by the ICTV Viroid Study Group. The impact of correct taxonomic annotation of viroid sequence variants is also addressed, taking into consideration the increasing application of next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics for known and previously unrecognized viroids.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 116 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Master 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Other 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 18%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,911,788
of 22,908,162 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#709
of 4,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,453
of 245,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,908,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.