↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
Title
Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2014
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1414542111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane Schreiweis, Ulrich Bornschein, Eric Burguière, Cemil Kerimoglu, Sven Schreiter, Michael Dannemann, Shubhi Goyal, Ellis Rea, Catherine A French, Rathi Puliyadi, Matthias Groszer, Simon E Fisher, Roger Mundry, Christine Winter, Wulf Hevers, Svante Pääbo, Wolfgang Enard, Ann M Graybiel

Abstract

The acquisition of language and speech is uniquely human, but how genetic changes might have adapted the nervous system to this capacity is not well understood. Two human-specific amino acid substitutions in the transcription factor forkhead box P2 (FOXP2) are outstanding mechanistic candidates, as they could have been positively selected during human evolution and as FOXP2 is the sole gene to date firmly linked to speech and language development. When these two substitutions are introduced into the endogenous Foxp2 gene of mice (Foxp2(hum)), cortico-basal ganglia circuits are specifically affected. Here we demonstrate marked effects of this humanization of Foxp2 on learning and striatal neuroplasticity. Foxp2(hum/hum) mice learn stimulus-response associations faster than their WT littermates in situations in which declarative (i.e., place-based) and procedural (i.e., response-based) forms of learning could compete during transitions toward proceduralization of action sequences. Striatal districts known to be differently related to these two modes of learning are affected differently in the Foxp2(hum/hum) mice, as judged by measures of dopamine levels, gene expression patterns, and synaptic plasticity, including an NMDA receptor-dependent form of long-term depression. These findings raise the possibility that the humanized Foxp2 phenotype reflects a different tuning of corticostriatal systems involved in declarative and procedural learning, a capacity potentially contributing to adapting the human brain for speech and language acquisition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Austria 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 305 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 22%
Researcher 72 21%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Master 37 11%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 65 19%
Unknown 30 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 36%
Neuroscience 66 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 9%
Psychology 28 8%
Linguistics 11 3%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 39 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 489. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#55,392
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#1,407
of 103,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#408
of 259,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#20
of 909 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 909 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.