Title |
Humanized Foxp2 accelerates learning by enhancing transitions from declarative to procedural performance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1414542111 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christiane Schreiweis, Ulrich Bornschein, Eric Burguière, Cemil Kerimoglu, Sven Schreiter, Michael Dannemann, Shubhi Goyal, Ellis Rea, Catherine A French, Rathi Puliyadi, Matthias Groszer, Simon E Fisher, Roger Mundry, Christine Winter, Wulf Hevers, Svante Pääbo, Wolfgang Enard, Ann M Graybiel |
Abstract |
The acquisition of language and speech is uniquely human, but how genetic changes might have adapted the nervous system to this capacity is not well understood. Two human-specific amino acid substitutions in the transcription factor forkhead box P2 (FOXP2) are outstanding mechanistic candidates, as they could have been positively selected during human evolution and as FOXP2 is the sole gene to date firmly linked to speech and language development. When these two substitutions are introduced into the endogenous Foxp2 gene of mice (Foxp2(hum)), cortico-basal ganglia circuits are specifically affected. Here we demonstrate marked effects of this humanization of Foxp2 on learning and striatal neuroplasticity. Foxp2(hum/hum) mice learn stimulus-response associations faster than their WT littermates in situations in which declarative (i.e., place-based) and procedural (i.e., response-based) forms of learning could compete during transitions toward proceduralization of action sequences. Striatal districts known to be differently related to these two modes of learning are affected differently in the Foxp2(hum/hum) mice, as judged by measures of dopamine levels, gene expression patterns, and synaptic plasticity, including an NMDA receptor-dependent form of long-term depression. These findings raise the possibility that the humanized Foxp2 phenotype reflects a different tuning of corticostriatal systems involved in declarative and procedural learning, a capacity potentially contributing to adapting the human brain for speech and language acquisition. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 9 | 12% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Spain | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 38 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 56 | 72% |
Scientists | 17 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
Austria | 3 | <1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Other | 6 | 2% |
Unknown | 305 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 22% |
Researcher | 72 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 41 | 12% |
Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 5% |
Other | 65 | 19% |
Unknown | 30 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 121 | 36% |
Neuroscience | 66 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 9% |
Psychology | 28 | 8% |
Linguistics | 11 | 3% |
Other | 42 | 12% |
Unknown | 39 | 12% |