You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Retraining motor control of abdominal muscles among elite cricketers with low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01019.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. A. Hides, W. R. Stanton, S. J. Wilson, M. Freke, S. McMahon, K. Sims |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to document the effect of a staged stabilization training program on the motor control of the anterolateral abdominal muscles in elite cricketers with and without low back pain (LBP). Changes in the cross-sectional area of the trunk, the thickness of the internal oblique and transversus abdominis (TrA) muscles and the shortening of the TrA muscle in response to an abdominal drawing-in task were measured at the start and completion of a 13-week cricket training camp. Measures were performed using ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging. Participants from the group with LBP underwent a stabilization training program that involved performing voluntary contractions of the multifidus, TrA and pelvic floor muscles, while receiving feedback from ultrasound imaging. By the end of the training camp, the motor control of cricketers with LBP who received the stabilization training improved and was similar to that of the cricketers without LBP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 173 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 47 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#2,655
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,234
of 107,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.