↓ Skip to main content

Iceland is not a magmatic analog for the Hadean: Evidence from the zircon record

Overview of attention for article published in Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Iceland is not a magmatic analog for the Hadean: Evidence from the zircon record
Published in
Earth & Planetary Science Letters, November 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.08.015
Authors

Tamara L. Carley, Calvin F. Miller, Joseph L. Wooden, Abraham J. Padilla, Axel K. Schmitt, Rita C. Economos, Ilya N. Bindeman, Brennan T. Jordan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 27%
Researcher 30 25%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 82 67%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 33 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#272,131
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#75
of 5,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,659
of 273,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth & Planetary Science Letters
#1
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,702 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.