↓ Skip to main content

Microglia: unique and common features with other tissue macrophages

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Microglia: unique and common features with other tissue macrophages
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00401-014-1267-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Prinz, Tuan Leng Tay, Yochai Wolf, Steffen Jung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 195 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 22%
Researcher 33 17%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 29%
Neuroscience 39 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,625,918
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,531
of 2,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,807
of 237,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.