↓ Skip to main content

Do Serologic and Synovial Tests Help Diagnose Infection in Revision Hip Arthroplasty With Metal‐on‐metal Bearings or Corrosion?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Do Serologic and Synovial Tests Help Diagnose Infection in Revision Hip Arthroplasty With Metal‐on‐metal Bearings or Corrosion?
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3902-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul H. Yi, Michael B. Cross, Mario Moric, Brett R. Levine, Scott M. Sporer, Wayne G. Paprosky, Joshua J. Jacobs, Craig J. Della Valle

Abstract

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients with failed metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings and corrosion reactions in hip arthroplasties can be particularly difficult, because the clinical presentation of adverse local tissue reactions may mimic that of PJI, because it can also occur concurrently with PJI, and because common laboratory tests used to diagnose PJI may be elevated in patients with MoM THAs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 101 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 9%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 18 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 57%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,063,934
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,674
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,896
of 361,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#61
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.