↓ Skip to main content

Central Asian Post-Soviet health systems in transition: has different aid engagement produced different outcomes?

Overview of attention for article published in Global Health Action, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Central Asian Post-Soviet health systems in transition: has different aid engagement produced different outcomes?
Published in
Global Health Action, September 2014
DOI 10.3402/gha.v7.24978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anar Ulikpan, Tolib Mirzoev, Eliana Jimenez, Asmat Malik, Peter S. Hill

Abstract

The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 resulted in a transition from centrally planned socialist systems to largely free-market systems for post-Soviet states. The health systems of Central Asian Post-Soviet (CAPS) countries (Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan) have undergone a profound revolution. External development partners have been crucial to this reorientation through financial and technical support, though both relationships and outcomes have varied. This research provides a comparative review of the development assistance provided in the health systems of CAPS countries and proposes future policy options to improve the effectiveness of development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,348,907
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Action
#238
of 1,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,856
of 225,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Action
#17
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.