↓ Skip to main content

研究・実務におけるテスト理論の活用実態 —— 本邦における測定・評価研究の動向 ——

Overview of attention for article published in The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
研究・実務におけるテスト理論の活用実態 —— 本邦における測定・評価研究の動向 ——
Published in
The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, March 2017
DOI 10.5926/arepj.56.137
Authors

川端 一光

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,397,069
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,114
of 312,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.