↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to neonicotinoids influences the motor function of adult worker honeybees

Overview of attention for article published in Ecotoxicology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Exposure to neonicotinoids influences the motor function of adult worker honeybees
Published in
Ecotoxicology, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10646-014-1283-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally M. Williamson, Sarah J. Willis, Geraldine A. Wright

Abstract

Systemic pesticides such as neonicotinoids are commonly used on flowering crops visited by pollinators, and their use has been implicated in the decline of insect pollinator populations in Europe and North America. Several studies show that neonicotinoids affect navigation and learning in bees but few studies have examined whether these substances influence their basic motor function. Here, we investigated how prolonged exposure to sublethal doses of four neonicotinoid pesticides (imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin, dinotefuran) and the plant toxin, nicotine, affect basic motor function and postural control in foraging-age worker honeybees. We used doses of 10 nM for each neonicotinoid: field-relevant doses that we determined to be sublethal and willingly consumed by bees. The neonicotinoids were placed in food solutions given to bees for 24 h. After the exposure period, bees were more likely to lose postural control during the motor function assay and fail to right themselves if exposed to imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, clothianidin. Bees exposed to thiamethoxam and nicotine also spent more time grooming. Other behaviours (walking, sitting and flying) were not significantly affected. Expression of changes in motor function after exposure to imidacloprid was dose-dependent and affected all measured behaviours. Our data illustrate that 24 h exposure to sublethal doses of neonicotinoid pesticides has a subtle influence on bee behaviour that is likely to affect normal function in a field setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 215 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 18%
Student > Bachelor 38 17%
Student > Master 30 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 43%
Environmental Science 24 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 5%
Neuroscience 11 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 51 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,501,548
of 24,052,577 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#138
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,399
of 230,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,052,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.