↓ Skip to main content

Direct and Indirect Economic Consequences of Multiple Sclerosis in Ireland

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Direct and Indirect Economic Consequences of Multiple Sclerosis in Ireland
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40258-014-0128-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emer Fogarty, Cathal Walsh, Christopher McGuigan, Niall Tubridy, Michael Barry

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has significant financial consequences for healthcare systems, individual patients and households, and the wider society. This study examines the distribution of MS costs and resource utilisation across cost categories and from various perspectives, as MS disability increases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Researcher 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 15 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 10%
Psychology 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,201,896
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#323
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,747
of 249,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.