↓ Skip to main content

Decay of a thermofield-double state in chaotic quantum systems

Overview of attention for article published in Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Decay of a thermofield-double state in chaotic quantum systems
Published in
Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings, September 2018
DOI 10.1140/epjst/e2018-00083-5
Authors

A. del Campo, J. Molina-Vilaplana, L. F. Santos, J. Sonner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Librarian 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 4 44%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#754
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,374
of 351,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal de Physique IV - Proceedings
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.