| Title |
Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure – the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, September 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1027330422958 |
| Authors |
Nils Anthes, Thomas Fartmann, Gabriel Hermann, Giselher Kaule |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#291
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,837
of 53,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them