| Title |
Navigating the Google Blind Spot: An Emerging Need for Professional Guidelines to Address Patient-Targeted Googling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-3030-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria J. Baker, Daniel R. George, Gordon L. Kauffman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 48% |
| Canada | 5 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 7 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2017.
All research outputs
#750,446
of 24,950,117 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#603
of 8,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,723
of 255,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,950,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.