↓ Skip to main content

ミュラー・リヤー錯視と角度錯視の関係

Overview of attention for article published in Kiso shinrigaku kenkyū, March 1995
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 125)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ミュラー・リヤー錯視と角度錯視の関係
Published in
Kiso shinrigaku kenkyū, March 1995
DOI 10.14947/psychono.kj00004413271
Authors

浜口 惠治

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#15,352,141
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Kiso shinrigaku kenkyū
#46
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,555
of 23,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kiso shinrigaku kenkyū
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 23,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.