↓ Skip to main content

A descriptive study of inaccuracy in article titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals

Overview of attention for article published in Scientometrics, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A descriptive study of inaccuracy in article titles on bibliometrics published in biomedical journals
Published in
Scientometrics, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11192-014-1296-5
Authors

Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent, Vicent Montalt-Resurecció, Juan Carlos Valderrama-Zurián

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Librarian 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Unspecified 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 15 30%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 28%
Linguistics 7 14%
Unspecified 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,995,085
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#811
of 2,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,738
of 226,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.